Current:Home > ContactAccused killer of Run-DMC's Jam Master Jay can't have his lyrics used against him, judge rules -CapitalEdge
Accused killer of Run-DMC's Jam Master Jay can't have his lyrics used against him, judge rules
View
Date:2025-04-22 19:39:21
NEW YORK — The man accused of killing Run-DMC's Jam Master Jay can't have his rap lyrics used against him at trial, a Brooklyn judge decided Tuesday in a ruling that doubled as a history-filled paean to hip-hop as "a platform for expression to many who had largely been voiceless."
The ruling came in response to an attempt by federal prosecutors to introduce lyrics penned by Karl Jordan Jr. as evidence of his role in gunning down Jay, a pioneering artist whose birth name was Jason Mizell. His 2002 death remains one of rap's most infamous slayings.
In her 14-page order, Brooklyn Federal Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall traced the evolution of hip-hop over five decades, referencing tracks from over a dozen artists before ultimately finding the lyrics inadmissible.
"From the genre's nascence as an oral tradition, rap artists have played the part of storytellers, providing a lens into their lives and those in their communities," Hall wrote.
Karl Jordan Jr.'s lyrics 'merely contain generic references to violence,' judge says
Prosecutors had sought to introduce several lines written by Jordan that described first-person accounts of violence and drug dealing, including: "We aim for the head, no body shots, and we stick around just to see the body drop."
Those lyrics didn't detail the specific crime, Hall wrote, but "merely contain generic references to violence that can be found in many rap songs."
She pointed to similar lines written by rappers Nas, Ice Cube and Vince Staples, along with interviews with artists like Fat Joe and Future who have publicly discussed the distance between their art and real lives.
Diving further into the genre's past, Hall cited the political activism of artists like A Tribe Called Quest and Queen Latifah, along with the role "gangsta rap" played "as a portal for others to see into America's urban centers."
"The Court cannot help but note that odious themes – including racism, misogyny, and homophobia – can be found in a wide swath of genres other than rap music," she added in a footnote, even referencing lyrics from the Rolling Stones and Jason Aldean, a controversial county music star.
The use of rap lyrics in criminal prosecutions has become a contentious subject in several high-profile cases, including the ongoing racketeering trial of Young Thug. In that case, the judge allowed the lyrics to be presented at trial — a decision that defense attorneys say amounts to racist "character assassination" meant to poison a jury already skeptical of rap music.
Murder trial:What we know about the men accused of killing Run-DMC star Jam Master Jay
'Artists should be free to create without fear,' judge says
In her ruling on Tuesday, Hall wrote that courts should be "wary" about allowing the use of hip-hop lyrics against criminal defendants because "artists should be free to create without fear that their lyrics could be unfairly used against them at a trial."
She said there could be specific exceptions in cases where lyrics discuss the precise details of a particular crime.Jordan and an accomplice, Ronald Washington, are accused of confronting Mizell in his recording studio in 2002, then shooting him in the head. The prosecution argues it was an act of revenge for cutting them out of a drug deal.
The killing had frustrated investigators for decades, but prosecutors said they made key strides in the case over the last five years, conducting new interviews and ballistic tests and getting witnesses to cooperate. Defense lawyers have claimed the government dragged its feet in indicting Washington and Jordan, making it harder for them to defend themselves.
Both men have pleaded not guilty, as has a third defendant who was charged this past May and will be tried separately.
veryGood! (77)
Related
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Vice Media says ‘several hundred’ staff members will be laid off, Vice.com news site shuttered
- Mississippi might allow incarcerated people to sue prisons over transgender inmates
- Your Summer Tan Is Here: Dolce Glow's Founder on How to Get the Perfect Celeb-Loved Bronze at Home
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Trump’s lawyers call for dismissal of classified documents case, citing presidential immunity
- Clues to a better understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome emerge from major study
- A look at Nvidia’s climb to prominence in the AI world, by the numbers
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Metal detectorist finds 1,400-year-old gold ring likely owned by royal family: Surreal
Ranking
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- University of Georgia cancels classes after woman found dead on campus
- Jelly Roll announces Beautifully Broken tour: Here are the dates, how to get tickets
- Trial over Black transgender woman’s death in rural South Carolina focuses on secret relationship
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- He moved in with his grandmas during COVID. Now, they're all going to the Oscars
- GOP-led Kentucky House votes to relax child labor rules and toughen food stamp eligibility standards
- Trump sells sneakers and Beyoncé is a country star. Is this the quiz or 2024 bingo?
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
A look at Nvidia’s climb to prominence in the AI world, by the numbers
Who has the power to sue Brett Favre over welfare money? 1 Mississippi Republican sues another
AT&T outage just a preview of what can happen when cell service goes out: How to prepare
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
The Excerpt podcast: The NIMBY war against green energy
A Mississippi university pauses its effort to remove ‘Women’ from its name
Gay rights advocates in Kentucky say expansion to religious freedom law would hurt LGBTQ+ safeguards